MINNEAPOLIS -- Oregon Republican Party vice chairman Russ Walker said Monday that he did not think Oregon’s House Democrats would be able to come up with a veto-proof majority in the State House this November.
Oregon Democratic leaders in the House have touted the idea of increasing their current 31-29 majority beyond the veto-proof 36 members. Some, including House Majority Leader Dave Hunt (D-Clackamas County) and Rep. Sara Gelser (D-Corvallis), have talked about the possibility of having 41 Democratic members in the Oregon House when the next legislative session starts in January.
“At the end of the day, I don’t think they’ll get 36,” Walker said at the Oregon delegation’s breakfast Monday morning. “I would like to see the possibility of a tie.”
Walker, who is also the Oregon director for FreedomWorks, told the state’s Republican delegates that environmentalists had blocked several initiatives to create alternative sources of energy, including in 2007 when the Oregon Surfrider Foundation blocking legislation that would have created wave power through the Florence Wave Energy facility. While there were potential bills that could be passed to allow for increased production of renewable energy, Walker said, unless the legislative branch changed party hands it was unlikely to pass.
“There’s definitely legislation out there that can help,” Walker said. “But that’s a matter of getting the legislature back in control of the Republicans.”
While he did not rule out that possibility, Walker was adamant that if the Democratic Party of a veto-proof majority, he believed the results would be disastrous for Oregon.
“If they get that majority, that would be bad,” Walker said. “They’ve shown in the Oregon legislature that they’ll make the wrong decision every time.”
"veto-proof" ? Gotta love the quality of journalism
on this website.
The point of 36 votes is not that it is veto-proof, but that it takes 36 to pass bills that raise taxes.
Wave Energy
Can someone actually do so homework here?
First up--- there is no 'legislation' regarding wave energy. And Surfrider's position is wholly for Wave Energy development on the Oregon Coast. What you're referring to here is a motion of intervention filed with The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission having to do with the siting of a facility off the south jetty of siuslaw river. Florence residents, both on the left and the right opposed the siting of a wave energy facility anywhere in Florence without community input. Oceanlinx, the contractor who applied for the permit never, ever, set foot inside of Florence to engage the community. What Surfrider's (a bipartisan organization) position is that coastal communities need to be engaged in order to find the best sites on the Oregon Coast for these facilities. Surfrider has been a champion of developing sound wave energy policy, alongside with every stakeholder, of making sure that this technology is implemented in a smart and reasonable way. Look into the Reedsport project and you'll see.
To characterize this as an effort 'to block legislation' is beyond the patently false. It's a lie. Shame on you freedomworks. You have no idea what you're talking about, but in the end, I'm sure you don't care. Thanks for lying to our 56 delegates for some sort of stupid political gain. You're an embarrassment to your own party, and all I see you championing here is pure ignorance.
Stiv's right on. I doubt
Stiv's right on. I doubt freedom works has a member in Oregon that is actually engaged in and understands these issues. I welcome a public debate. How has freedom work engaged in the broader alternative energy movement in Oregon? I've failed to find any of engagement in the Reedsport wave energy project, the Governor's Oregon Solutions project, or even Oregon's Wave Energy Trust. Have you spoken with the local fishing groups or are they radical fringe groups too? You're not supporting jobs or the economy, you're blindly supporting policy with no local or even statewide engagement.
Post new comment