The campaign for U.S. Senate candidate John Frohnmayer, who is running on the Independent ticket, is aggressively pushing out to reporters today a Riley Research poll finding that in a prosepctive general election race, Republican incumbent Gordon Smith receives 39%, with Frohnmayer picking up 14% - ahead of Democrat Jeff Merkley, who receives 12%. The poll of 401 Oregon voters was conducted between November 30 and December 12. It has a margin of error of 4.89%.
But Democrats express reservations about Michael Riley’s research. Advisers said that the poll – taken over a span of several weeks as opposed to the customary several days – fail to produce a “snapshot” of the electorate. “401 voters contacted over 13 days is some of the worst basic methodology I've seen in a long time,” said one Democratic campaign aide.
A Democratic operative who is not working for Senate candidate but who is experienced in Oregon campaigns and is familiar with Reilly’s methods said that the pollster’s method often skews conservative and screens for older voters – a “country club” segment of the state’s population, as the operative put it.
The operative, who worked on Democrat Ted Kulongoski’s campaign for governor in 2006, said that Reilly’s polling in that race was inadequate. While Kulongoski internal polling found the Democrat solidly ahead, a poll released as late as October 3, 2006 found Republican candidate Ron Saxton leading Kulongoski 39% to 37%. Kulongoski would win the race 51% to 43%.
Riley’s Web site says the company polls for a variety of industries, including advertising, government, retail, and healthcare. But Democrats say that Riley is focused on conservative, business-oriented interests.
That the poll released today was commissioned by Frohnmayer’s Independent Party is perhaps one of the most significant reasons to be dismissive of the survey, said Matt Miller, a spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.
Frohnmayer defended the poll in an interview with PolitickerOR.com today, saying that Reilly was a well-known and respected Oregon pollster. “I have no reason to question his partiality,” said Frohnmayer, the former head of the National Endowment of the Arts.
Frohnmayer said that his campaign “was pleased with the results” of the poll, which showed him drawing support across party lines.
“The time is right for an independent who is not affiliated,” he said.
“It was a bit of a surprise that John received that big a response,” Independent Party activist Sal Peralta said of the poll. “But, at the same time, he’s speaking to a lot of issues that Oregonians are concerned with – especially holding the Bush administration accountable.”
Big speechs, big endorsements, and big donations were spread throughout Oregon this week. Both Democrats on the Portland City Council and newly appointed GOP State Rep. Matt ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
anonymous concern trolling
Amazing how you just couldn't manage to get any of those "anonymous Democratic aides" onto the record, to try to dismiss a poll that puts Merkley in third out of three.
I've never been a strong proponent of Riley's polls, but the concern trolls are trying to stoke doubt here just on principle.
*13 days in the field is unusual but not unheard of--and in any case, it's only a flag if there might have been events during that period which could have changed people's responses. 11 months out from the general election, that seems highly unlikely. The use of the phrase "several weeks" to mean "less than two" means the reporter was being successfully spun, there.
*They studiously ignore the fact that there are TWO Riley polls on the race, both asked in the same way. Even for polling that is less concordant with external reality, if the methods are consistent between two polls by the same pollster (which they appear to be in this case), the trend data can be very informative. And these data show Frohnmayer gaining--and Merkley dropping. Even if we're talking about the "country club set", whatever that refers to, the same screening questions of those same people yielded negative trends for the so-called frontrunning Democrat.
The rush to dismiss the numbers tells me somebody's camp is pretty worried about what they foretell...
Post new comment