April 3, 2008 - 1:33pm
News

The debate over the Merkley-Novick debate

In anticipation of tomorrow’s debate between Jeff Merkley and Steve Novick at the Portland City Club, Matt Canter, the former’s spokesman, offered a bit of a preview of how he foresees the event.

The expectations echo sentiments already expressed in the race; Canter believes Novick will “start insulting Jeff out of the box. Insult after insult, calling him cautious, moderate, establishment, calling him any name he can possibly think of.” 

Canter said both men have been committed progressives, and that tomorrow will offer not so much a policy debate, but a debate in style.

“It will be a contrast in the old politics of insults versus the new politics of change and hope,” he said.  

Jake Weigler, Novick’s campaign manager, has his own expectations for tomorrow.

In response to Canter’s statement that “Novick puts food on his table be being a professional attack dog,” Weigler pointed out that the only campaign trotting out personal insults is that of Jeff Merkley. He also noted that earlier this week when Novick called upon Merkley to substantiate his polling statement regarding the specific campaigns on which Novick had acted as an “attack dog,” the Speaker couldn’t do it. 

“We are going to make the case that this is not how they are going to beat Smith, by putting out false attacks they can’t back up or support with evidence, or by attacking personal integrity,” Weigler said.

 

LAUREN LAFARO can be reached via email at lauren.lafaro@politickeror.com.
Related topics: Steve Novick, Jeff Merkley

Comments

How about those attacks on Obama, Weigler?


Those are looking mighty careless now, aren't they?

04/04/08 12:53 am

How about that "anti-war" column, Merkley surrogate?


After boasting his pre-war, anti-war cred, Speaker Merkley is looking mighty foolish now.

Sort of when he avoided debating Novick for 6 months and doesn't seem to hold his own against Candy Neville either.

Sure, I'm a Novick supporter, and volunteer for Obama, and I work for Walsh... and what they all have in common is the audacity to challenge the establishment. There is an elitist element of the Democratic Party, represtented by entitlement politicians like Clinton, Merkley and Blumenauer.

Hillary, your vote for the war was a mistake. Jeff, your vote to acknowledge the "courage" of George W. Bush was a mistake. Earl, your vote for $50 billion worth of continued American occupation in Iraq was a breach of your pledge.

04/04/08 10:32 am

Where's Bubba?


OK, so Matt Canter is playing Howard Wolfson and doing a bang-up job of it ("Insult after insult, calling him cautious, moderate, establishment, calling him any name he can possibly think of.”). Oooooo! That nasty, mean man!

Jeff Merkley is running his campaign straight from Hillary's playbook expecting from the start to be anointed without any competition, then trying every other ploy but the tears and a fright wig.

Kari Chisholm making like master strategist Mark Penn.

But how can they make it work without somebody being Big Bubba, wagging his finger at the camera and complaining about the media?

Oh.... right. It's NOT working, even for Hillary.

04/04/08 12:19 pm

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.