On the eve of the Oregon primary, two new polls are showing differing pictures of tomorrow night’s results.
A Suffolk University poll has Sen. Hillary Clinton closing in on rival Sen. Barack Obama, 45 to 41 percent, with a four point margin of error.
Suffolk interviewed 600 likely voters in Oregon, and found the Senators to be competitive for female votes, an important demographic for Clinton.
Public Policy Polling found a different story: Obama leading Clinton 56 to 38 percent with a 2.7 percent margin of error. They also found Obama leading Clinton with women voters, which led the PPP to conclude it is “nearly impossible for Clinton to win.”
PPP President Dean Debnam compared Oregon to Wisconsin. “[Obama] started out with a small lead there, then built it into the upper double figures as election day came nearer,” he said. “Anything other than a double digit victory for him would be a surprise, and a disappointment for his campaign.”
Public Policy Polling, which employed an automated poll to survey 1,296 likely voters, also addressed the statewide races.
They found Steve Novick leading House Speaker Jeff Merkley 38 to 33 percent, but the advantage is within the poll’s margin of error.
Numbers for the Attorney General’s race were a bit clearer. John Kroger, at 42 percent had an eleven point lead over Rep. Greg Macpherson. PPP also found Sen. Kate Brown tromping her rivals in the Secretary of State race, with 42 percent. Sen. Rick Metsger had 19 percent and Sen. Vicki Walker garnered 17 percent.
Both polls were conducted May 17-18.
Big speechs, big endorsements, and big donations were spread throughout Oregon this week. Both Democrats on the Portland City Council and newly appointed GOP State Rep. Matt ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
The Poll is not scientific
The Poll is not scientific poll. I is just a random sample. You can take this poll with a grain of salt.
Surprised
I am surprised most by the Sec of State results...This is a huge point swing from the Tribune poll. I am convinced no one knows what is going on. Fun times in Oregon. We will know the answer to all of these questions in a mere 30 hours...
BTW, these guys predicted a 4 point win by Obama in Pennsylvania...soooo
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_042108.pdf
polls...
For once I agree with Ben, though I really hope this poll is correct. I've been rather pessimistically thinking that unfair negative ads work, and it would be lovely to see Macpherson's choice to run such a nasty campaign backfire.
nastiness in the eye of the beholder
Macpherson's choice to "go nasty" was a good one. Now, I don't agree he was nasty anyways, but Kroger is a great campaigner, while Macpherson is just a boring old fantastic policymaker with a boring old record of important legislative accomplishments in Oregon.
Macpherson was on track to lose because voters will choose an inspiring empty suit over a boring policy wonk every time. It was critical for Macpherson to point out Kroger's significant weaknesses to voters, and bully to him for doing so with such effective ads.
If Macpherson loses, it will not be because he "went nasty". It will be because Kroger's charisma beat out Macpherson's thoughtful policy mind and record of getting important things done in the legislature.
Post new comment