In a race where each candidate’s supporters have often been verbose and vehement (note discussion threads on Blue Oregon and Loaded Orygun over the past several months), campaign staffers, such as Hayes Ingraham, have gone one step above and beyond proclamations and verbal taunting.
Ingraham, 22, Jeff Merkley’s U.S. Senate campaign’s most recent hire, harkened back to the tried and true political hijinks of a bygone, pre-technology era, when he walked into Steve Novick’s territory several days ago.
Using an alias, he sought to procure the opponent’s campaign ‘goods,’ (which included a bumper sticker and a remit form) and to check in on what materials Novick was publically distributing.
“This just came to light, he never should have done this, it was an error in judgment,” Canter said, also noting that Ingraham violated the code of conduct all of Merkley’s staff is required to sign at the time they are brought on.
“This is not behavior that lives up to the standard Jeff Merkley has for himself or his campaign,” Canter continued.
Merkley’s staffer is not the only one to have infiltrated the opposition in some way; Henry Kraemer, Deputy Outreach Coordinator for the Novick campaign, was caught editing Jeff Merkley’s Wikipedia page back in January.
Ingraham will be remaining with the campaign, and has apologized to both candidates. Kraemer also proffered a timely apology on Witigonian.
This week's Winners & Losers. CLICK HERE >
Janet Napolitano, the Democratic governor of Arizona and an early supporter of Barack Obama's presidential campaign, is being mentioned for several federal posts, including Attorney General ... >
somewhat worse than a Wikipedia edit
A Wikipedia edit by its nature is fully transparent and Henry Kraemer did not attempt to make the edit anonymously.
That's significantly different from taking a false identity and trying to pass yourself off to the Novick campaign as a fake fundraising volunteer (as Willamette Week reported).
Noteworthy
It should be noted that the WikiPedia page was not edited with any nonfactual information. He simply added the full text of a resolution Merkley had voted for in the House.
Freudian Slip?
"Portlandia" seems to have belatedly caught her own Freudian slip in comments at Willamette Week. There she effectly stated that the Novick campaign had in fact attempted to game the PDA endorsement.
she did?
Putting aside that I don't know what it means to effectly state something, where does Portlandia say Novick tried to do anything? What it does is identify "ethical breaches" the Merkley campaign has complained about--regardless of whether they're batshit crazy allegations or not. (Hint: they are--remember that the person who originally made them was rebuked by his source and told to "stop swiftboating Steve Novick." Ouch.)
Man, character attacks and hopeful parsing of blog comments. Merkley must really be ahead in this race. (cough)
Post new comment